Dell MXG071

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell MXG071  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KX412
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 21:15
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Extreme X9000
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 72.8
1-Core 45.2
2-Core 87.4
44% 68.5 Pts
4-Core 91.2
8-Core 92.6
12% 91.9 Pts
64-Core 94.6
6% 94.6 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX
Dell(1028 019C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.42% Terrible
Lighting 15
Reflection 7.08
Parallax 3.25
12% 8.43 fps
MRender 0.57
Gravity 7.83
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.42%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ARRAY 400GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 95 97 68 85 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 88.5
64% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.2
14% 4.83 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.3
13% 4.53 GB/s
Latency 95.2
42% 95.2 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MXG071 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Dell MXG071

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $112
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback