Toshiba Qosmio X300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemToshiba Qosmio X300  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA KSRAA
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090310
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 16 '17 at 20:39
Run Duration485 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo P8600-$42
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.1% Average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 31.1
2-Core 62.5
38% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 61.7
8-Core 65.9
8% 63.8 Pts
64-Core 36.5
2% 36.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800M GTX
Toshiba(1179 FF01) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8642
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
4.54% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.58
Parallax 2.31
5% 5.1 fps
MRender 3.76
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3.39
3% 4.02 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.54%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
38GB free
Firmware: Z331 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 215
Write 106
Mixed 98.2
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 2.44
27% 9.41 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 57.3
DQ Mixed 6.12
31% 72.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 70%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 85.9
Mixed 5.72
44% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.25
75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio X300 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback