Today's hottest deals

Asus P8B75-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121010
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 12:51
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 169
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 320
43% 320 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 21
18% 20.4 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 16.9
17% 21.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 240GB
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0319A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 345 348 358 359 358 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 413
Write 358
Mixed 333
SusWrite 342
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 14.3
87% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 18
28% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 92%
WD Black 2.5" 500GB (2011)-$50
466GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 112 111 114 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 115
Write 105
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 112
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.5% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX Builds (Compare 1,094 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback