Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE

Performance Results


Gaming 117% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 102% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171225
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '18 at 06:32
Run Duration	384 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700K-$229 712,312 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 142 2-Core 278 95% 171 Pts	4-Core 477 8-Core 766 76% 622 Pts	64-Core 775 48% 775 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$350 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.24 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 200 Parallax 179 145% 186 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 177 Splatting 124 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 621GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 13850 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2037 (B1) Unknown 98 98 21 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 51 41 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 391 (EB) Unknown 99 99 311 (F1) Unknown 99 99 53462249494	63.6% Good	Read 259 Write 176 Mixed 183 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 26.1 118% 38.9 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 80.8 82% 135 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 126%
Intel 545s Series 512GB-$95 12,034 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 289GB free Firmware: LHF002C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 33 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 19 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4295491585 (AE) Unknown 100 100 8 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 36 49 81607589924 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 37540 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 0 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 0 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (EC) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 37540 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3039 (F9) Unknown 100 100 1395 (FC) Unknown 100 100 1	78.2% Very good	Read 487 Write 263 Mixed 275 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 42.6 4K Write 55 4K Mixed 19.5 119% 39 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 41.2 70% 137 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 128%
G.skill FM-25S3-240GPF 240GB 294 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 130GB free Firmware: SAFM01.3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3887 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 682 (11) Unknown 100 100 71 (A8) Unknown 100 100 64 (AA) Unknown 100 100 554 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65551 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 107 (C2) HDA temperature 70 70 128850919454 (DA) Unknown 100 100 27 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 355 (F1) Unknown 100 100 324	93.3% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 497 Mixed 506 113% 504 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 94.2 4K Mixed 15.2 119% 47.4 MB/s	DQ Read 106 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 14.2 63% 134 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 109%
ST3000VN 007-2E4166 3TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.7% Above average	Read 133 Write 125 Mixed 106 153% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.2 65% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 53%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	42% Average	Read 92 Write 107 Mixed 99.1 131% 99.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.31 70% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 71%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Read 37.6 Write 39 Mixed 30.3 45% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 2.48 4K Mixed 0.25 96% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 44%
ST350063 0AS 500GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 466GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 75.6 Write 79.6 Mixed 46.6 84% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.73 4K Mixed 0.39 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 33%
INTEL SS DSA2M080G2GC 80GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 172% 30GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	209% Outstanding	Read 244 Write 79.5 Mixed 114 157% 146 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 6.56 1,977% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 56 DQ Mixed 7.68 2,241% 28 MB/s
Poor: 135% ↑ This bench: 209% Great: 209%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 1,557 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 10GB free, PID 5500 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	9.81% Terrible	Read 39.9 Write 10.3 Mixed 10.1 20% 20.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.08 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.04 29% 2.38 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.81% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x16GB 998 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 31.5 MC Mixed 25.6 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 26.3 75% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS IX CODE Builds (Compare 1,329 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 90%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX CODE - $279

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $229Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	1,020x
Core i7-6700KIntel $170Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	96x
Core i7-7700k VHIntelBench 84%, 9,708 samples	62x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $350Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	255x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	201x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	96x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	58x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $139Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	52x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	47x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $38Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	60x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $118Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	42x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $48Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	35x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $981

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406