Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion KJ381AA-ABA m9260f

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KJ381AA-ABA m9260f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '19 at 00:01
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6700-$192 6,294 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Memory 71.3 1-Core 30.9 2-Core 61.7 38% 54.6 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 116 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 120 7% 120 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 8,099 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8243) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.12% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 4.38 Parallax 0.78 2% 2.47 fps	MRender 4.9 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 3.48 3% 3.32 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.12% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 297GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 225 220 227 236 234 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.6% Above average	Read 250 Write 236 Mixed 226 SusWrite 227 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 38.6 4K Mixed 28 89% 29.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 145 110% 150 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 129%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 301GB free Firmware: 3.CH SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 68.8 Write 43 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 71 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 43%
ST350063 0AS 500GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 121GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 30 Write 16 Mixed 23.3 SusWrite 25.9 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.23 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.6 13% 4.6 GB/s	Latency 98.3 41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KJ381AA-ABA m9260f Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: Hp-pavilion KJ381AA-ABA m9260f

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6700Intel $192Bench 44%, 6,294 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x

RAM
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $192

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400

Hp-pavilion KJ381AA-ABA m9260f

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: Hp-pavilion KJ381AA-ABA m9260f

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)