Today's hottest deals

HP 870-119

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 870-119  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 828A
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190522
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 06:35
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$130
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 91.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 243
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 474
63% 472 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 77.5
Parallax 95.5
0% 57.7 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 61.5
56% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB6S-256G-1006 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X3511006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 251 205 186 124 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 421
Write 201
Mixed 179
SusWrite 195
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 93
4K Mixed 26.2
123% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 301
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 200
168% 245 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 190 191 191 187 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 138
Mixed 79
SusWrite 188
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 102%
Great: 114%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00WN9B0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.6 1.8 0 0.5 2.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
24% Poor
Read 114
Write 118
Mixed 88.8
SusWrite 0.8
102% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24%
Great: 61%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 46 131 124 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 114
Write 114
Mixed 46.1
SusWrite 71.1
112% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 60%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Read 132
Write 134
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 0
95% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 60%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
330GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 0.1
108% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 69%
ST3000DM 007-1WY10G 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.4 0 0.4 2.1 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 94.7
Write 132
Mixed 109
SusWrite 0.5
113% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 61%
ST3000VN 007-2E4166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 149 139 131 124 127 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53% Above average
Read 150
Write 139
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 134
150% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
36% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53%
Great: 53%
ST3000VN 007-2E4166 3TB
384GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 148 93 0.3 1 0.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.3% Below average
Read 110
Write 142
Mixed 38
SusWrite 63.1
116% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 53%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
900GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 0 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 116
Write 138
Mixed 26.1
SusWrite 0
85% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.5
223% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.1
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-119 Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

System: HP 870-119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback