MSI Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7972
MotherboardMSI Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972)  (all builds)
Memory15.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 09 '18 at 15:10
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90% Excellent
Memory 94.8
1-Core 130
2-Core 252
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 717
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 714
44% 714 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 38.1
34% 37.1 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 37
31% 38 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 520
Write 266
Mixed 324
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 19.9
125% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 16.6
82% 186 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 129%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 133
Write 137
Mixed 133
101% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.44
117% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 229
Write 205
Mixed 198
158% 210 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.52
4K Mixed 0.24
99% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 124%
Great: 88%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 3TB-$63
1.5TB free
Firmware: MKAOA580 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 217
Write 179
Mixed 184
146% 193 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.72
4K Mixed 0.26
102% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 114%
Great: 87%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70
253GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Read 88.7
Write 92.7
Mixed 77.3
65% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.19
78% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 250GB
228GB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
174% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 246
Mixed 242
315% 244 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 26.2
4K Mixed 12.3
1,387% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 22.6
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 13.6
1,652% 22.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 174%
Great: 174%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 029E CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
3001, 3001, 3001, 3001 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 29.5
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 25.4
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972) Builds (Compare 370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z170M MORTAR (MS-7972) - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $499
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback