Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '23 at 00:32
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 85.3
44% 67.6 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 224
24% 191 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.3
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 34.7
27% 34.8 fps
MRender 33.9
Gravity 34.9
Splatting 24.7
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$73
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 77 79 81 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 187
Write 184
Mixed 183
SusWrite 77.4
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 33.8
108% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 37.5
DQ Write 69.1
DQ Mixed 48.1
38% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 127%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$75
68GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 79 80 82 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
46.1% Average
Read 81.3
Write 76.6
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 78.9
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 65%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
801GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 104 102 101 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 65.7
Write 75.5
Mixed 47.4
SusWrite 102
53% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 73%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Read 53.3
Write 28.1
Mixed 26
SusWrite 0.1
31% 26.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 19%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
263GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.1 4.2 4.3 3.9 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 50.1
Write 32.9
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 4.2
34% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
69% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 19%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
539GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 4.7 5.3 6.2 0.7 0.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 92.9
Write 91
Mixed 52.8
SusWrite 4.6
75% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 44%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
524GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 74 74 73 78 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 94.2
Write 93.7
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 74.8
107% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35%
Great: 40%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
37GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 30 30 31 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 51.4
Write 32.8
Mixed 25.6
SusWrite 29.9
44% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1
73% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 19%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
117GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 1.9 2.1 3 0.2 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 55
Write 64.4
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 2
52% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 40%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB
73GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 75 75 78 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 109
Write 103
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 75.9
113% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 46%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
35GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.2 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 52.3
Write 30.6
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 0.2
31% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
51% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7002 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-MA785GM-US2H Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA785GM-US2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $140Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $87
Intel Core i5-13600K $206Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback