Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N72-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4N72-E  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110414
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 13:41
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9950
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 40.2
2-Core 80.7
45% 66.7 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 153
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
Zotac(19DA 1346) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 18
Parallax 20.6
17% 19.8 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 22.7
Splatting 16.6
17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 171 172 117 247 171 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
90GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 60 60 62 56 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 59.7
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 58
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB-$270
58GB free
Firmware: ML6OA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 61 62 64 58 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 64.4
Write 62.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 59.5
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$80
235GB free
Firmware: MN6OAA10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 95 91 88 77 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 138
Write 137
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 85.4
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
79GB free
Firmware: JKAOA28A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 63 64 66 57 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 55
SusWrite 62.4
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
160% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 5.83 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N72-E Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N72-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $432
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback