Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '16 at 05:08
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$89
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 551
8-Core 893
88% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
Asus(1043 0330) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
16% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 12.8
Parallax 20
18% 18.3 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 16.3
Splatting 16.3
12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 2,302
Write 1,454
Mixed 1,542
391% 1,766 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 60.7
248% 96.6 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 399
DQ Mixed 34.6
149% 338 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 278%
Great: 283%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$44
847GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 88.3
Mixed 88.5
67% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.51
114% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$80
593GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 156
Mixed 144
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.42
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
380GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 78.1
Mixed 74
62% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.51
96% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$90
139GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 92
Write 73.4
Mixed 66.4
58% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.93
4K Mixed 0.39
77% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
43GB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 130
Mixed 117
95% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.13
57% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
36GB free
Firmware: CC52 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 110
Write 115
Mixed 102
82% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 0.88
4K Mixed 0.15
57% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 96%
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
73GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 38.5
Write 36.1
Mixed 13
35% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.14
70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 45.9
MC Write 56.6
MC Mixed 45.9
141% 49.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 22.4
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 126%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX X99 GAMING Builds (Compare 1,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X99 GAMING - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $217Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback