Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 (all builds)
Memory	16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220813
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '23 at 13:28
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-13400-$187 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 106% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 70.8 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 151 57% 98 Pts	4-Core 301 8-Core 531 50% 416 Pts	64-Core 914 57% 914 Pts
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme HS-SSD-E2000 1024G 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 256% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1463 1357 891 833 798 839 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 931 Write 1,708 Mixed 1,053 SusWrite 1,030 268% 1,180 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 50.9 177% 67.5 MB/s	DQ Read 800 DQ Write 660 DQ Mixed 693 529% 718 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 380%
Seagate ST4000VM000-1F3168 4TB 649 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 891GB free Firmware: SC11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 125 125 126 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	75.2% Very good	Read 138 Write 148 Mixed 72 SusWrite 124 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 14GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 161 160 154 155 156 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	70.4% Very good	Read 87.1 Write 138 Mixed 68 SusWrite 157 82% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.6 206% 2 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 90%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 8GB free Firmware: AX0A3H SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 50 53 53 54 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 99.3 Write 68.5 Mixed 37.1 SusWrite 50.8 47% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 62%
Toshiba MD04ABA400V 4TB 316 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 77GB free Firmware: FP1T SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 86 88 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 67.6 Write 84.9 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 86.8 51% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 92%
Seagate USB 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 77GB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.8 5 4.9 5.3 5.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 78GB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.9 4.9 5.1 5.3 5.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 77GB free Firmware: 050B SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.8 5 5.1 5.4 5.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate USB 4TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 77GB free Firmware: 0508 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 4.8 5 4.8 3.8 5.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 90%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 8TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 53GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.9 3.8 3.9 3.8 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 51 Write 29.7 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 3.9 32% 27.7 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.9 86% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 19%
Seagate USB 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 77GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.7 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 32 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 3.7 30% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 20%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 77GB free, PID 50a0 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.6 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 52.1 Write 31.2 Mixed 30 SusWrite 3.7 35% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 46% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 84%
Seagate USB 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 77GB free, PID a0a4 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 51.4 Write 30.4 Mixed 26.4 SusWrite 3.7 33% 28 MB/s	4K Read 7.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 109% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 77GB free, PID a0a4 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.6 2.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 52 Write 30 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 3.5 32% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 97%
Seagate USB 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 77GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.7 3.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 49.9 Write 31.9 Mixed 29 SusWrite 3.7 34% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 52% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 5,740 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 34.1 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 18.5 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	21	60	0"	1280 720

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,330 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $110Bench 98%, 48,886 samples	691x
Core i5-12600KIntel $154Bench 109%, 101,563 samples	251x
Core i5-12400Intel $151Bench 98%, 17,352 samples	251x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	312x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	243x
RTX 3070Nvidia $495Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	187x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $110Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	97x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $88Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	81x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $72Bench 224%, 92,081 samples	81x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	143x
KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GBKingstonBench 91%, 43,162 samples	133x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $38Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	76x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $490

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353