Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 255%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 237%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics277% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 21:40
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 133
2-Core 266
92% 165 Pts
4-Core 509
8-Core 875
84% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,134
70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$960
Asus(1043 88CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3225 MHz, MLim: 6175 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
277% Outstanding
Lighting 456
Reflection 441
Parallax 482
372% 460 fps
MRender 552
Gravity 379
Splatting 0.2
220% 310 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 277%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 54 87 71 55 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 500
Write 434
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 108
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 48.4
68% 128 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 100%
Adata Premier SP550 120GB-$45
76GB free
Firmware: O1230C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 56 60 57 56 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 494
Write 367
Mixed 349
SusWrite 97.1
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 38.5
133% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 232
190% 271 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 91%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
131GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 46 424 448 451 350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 501
Write 452
Mixed 411
SusWrite 295
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 0.9
72% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 51.3
DQ Mixed 0.9
33% 83.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 100%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
93GB free
Firmware: SBM02103
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,980
Write 2,083
Mixed 1,547
417% 1,870 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 40.7
179% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 597
DQ Mixed 607
477% 662 MB/s
Poor: 150% Great: 352%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$46
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 113 112 115 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 111
Write 117
Mixed 76.9
SusWrite 113
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
355GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 90 88 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 82.9
Write 88.2
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 89.3
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 96%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 4TB
3TB free, PID 50a0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 137 137 136 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 132
Write 133
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 137
162% 120 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 1
432% 5.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1.1
427% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
119% Outstanding
MC Read 57.9
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 44.9
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 42.1
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 0G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
4% 8% 50 218 60 240 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 1,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $529
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback