Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive431% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory55.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 20:38
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$133
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 170
2-Core 331
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 889
93% 748 Pts
64-Core 975
60% 975 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.4% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 37.2
Parallax 29.9
27% 33.4 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 28
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2904 2880 3025 3126 3117 3132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
431% Outstanding
Read 2,953
Write 3,194
Mixed 2764
SusWrite 3,030
674% 2,985 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 90.7
274% 92.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,078
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 922
691% 928 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 431%
Great: 508%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$140
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 139 146 136 146 135 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 37.7
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 20.2
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
258% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 92%
Seagate USB 4TB
3TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 33.2
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 18.9
38% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
48% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GVK 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 38.3
99% 34.7 GB/s
SC Read 30.8
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 38.5
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $188

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $991
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback