Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH551
Memory	20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '23 at 17:29
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Memory 91.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 248 86% 154 Pts	4-Core 448 8-Core 812 76% 630 Pts	64-Core 1,160 72% 1,160 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q) 3,561 User benchmarks, average bench 86% Device(1A58 2009) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.77 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	85.2% Excellent	Lighting 97.4 Reflection 159 Parallax 92.2 79% 116 fps	MRender 149 Gravity 106 Splatting 105 96% 120 fps
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
T-force TM8FP8002T 2TB 870 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: V9002s65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 709 736 758 757 757 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,611 Write 676 Mixed 729 SusWrite 694 205% 927 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 37.7 139% 51.3 MB/s	DQ Read 242 DQ Write 451 DQ Mixed 404 290% 366 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 274%
ST14000N M001G-2KJ103 14TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 9TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 0.8 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 234 Write 205 Mixed 189 SusWrite 4.8 199% 158 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 1.3 549% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 4.1 DQ Write 8.6 DQ Mixed 1.1 345% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 104%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2TB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 107 107 108 107 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 111 Write 105 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 103 132% 98.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 49%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA500 5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.2 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 140 Write 139 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 4.9 108% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 169% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 71%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB 4,635 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0827 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 96 97 96 96 97 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 94.8 Write 96.4 Mixed 84.6 SusWrite 94.8 127% 92.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 78% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 43%
WDC WD40 00FYYZ-01UL1B2 4TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 83 83 84 84 82 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 142 Write 134 Mixed 102 SusWrite 79.5 151% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 1.1 150% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 48%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 349GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 83 84 84 84 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 81.1 Write 86.8 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 80.3 94% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.M8FB 2x16GB 395 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.3 MC Write 33.7 MC Mixed 23.8 86% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 18.1 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 26.5 72% 25.3 GB/s	Latency 63.4 63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 100%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	59	60	48.8"	1280 720	SAM0F99 C49RG9x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	1,308x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	504x
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 93%, 3,436 samples	399x
RTX 2070S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 86%, 3,561 samples	382x

SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	313x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	203x
CA5-8D512 512GBNvmeBench 171%, 2,452 samples	149x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	654x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	173x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16