Lenovo 80ST

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 80ST (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Toronto 5B1
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 16 '18 at 20:42
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR) 5,770 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Memory 37.9 1-Core 45.2 2-Core 79.1 32% 54.1 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 137 16% 123 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 380A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	4.02% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 7.23 Parallax 7.66 4% 6.7 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 4.48 4% 4.36 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.02% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB 36,832 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA12.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 111 84 83 91 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 363 Write 191 Mixed 271 SusWrite 108 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 35 4K Mixed 17 66% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 164 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 141 113% 158 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 90%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 770GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 103 102 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 104 Write 105 Mixed 37.3 SusWrite 102 115% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GB 467 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1200, 1067 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	21% Poor	MC Read 8.3 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 7.2 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 5.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	Latency 212 19% 212 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 24%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80ST Builds (Compare 113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 36%

Jet ski

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80ST

CPU
A10-9600P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 33%, 13,243 samples	62x
A12-9700P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 34%, 5,770 samples	47x
FX-9800P APU (2016 M.BR)AMDBench 36%, 3,040 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 13,858 samples	62x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	51x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $30Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	2x
SSD 240GBBench 75%, 38,401 samples	2x

RAM
RMSA3260MB78HAF2400 Samsung M471A5244BB0-CPB 12GBRamaxelBench 22%, 358 samples	21x
M471A5244CB0-CRC M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 467 samples	20x
M471A5143EB0-CPB M471A5244BB0-CPB 8GBSamsungBench 22%, 321 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16