Asus UN65U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus UN65U  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK UN65U
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180523
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 02:39
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7500U
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 187
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 294
40% 295 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 61%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 480GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 298 304 301 305 304 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 404
Write 397
Mixed 304
SusWrite 314
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 32.5
104% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 232
203% 305 MB/s
WDC WD20 EARX-00PASB0 2TB
855GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 4.7 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.85% Terrible
Read 31.3
Write 21.3
Mixed 18
SusWrite 4.2
23% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 6.85%
Great: 48%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB
592GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 37 33 31 34 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 25.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 33.5
41% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
53% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 62%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
576GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 9.2 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 37.3
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 8
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 71%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA500 5TB
440GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0.1 0 9.4 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 36.7
Write 35.6
Mixed 32
SusWrite 8
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
120% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75% Very good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 25
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 23.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UN65U Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus UN65U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback