Asus ROG STRIX Z790-H GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 183%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 131%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive277% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-H GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory47.7 GB free of 64 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230926
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$451
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Memory 88.3
1-Core 232
2-Core 463
134% 261 Pts
4-Core 926
8-Core 1,798
162% 1,362 Pts
64-Core 4,243
263% 4,243 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 131%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 412
Parallax 351
49% 274 fps
MRender 378
Gravity 272
Splatting 194
220% 282 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 106%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot M.2 P400 1024GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 444 414 449 443 344 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 3,142
Write 486
Mixed 978
SusWrite 424
272% 1,258 MB/s
4K Read 84
4K Write 278
4K Mixed 78.9
375% 147 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 487
DQ Mixed 315
239% 309 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 277%
Great: 535%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$158
154GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1998 1913 1892 1838 1731 1707 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
423% Outstanding
Read 2,524
Write 2,515
Mixed 2,378
SusWrite 1,847
522% 2316 MB/s
4K Read 73.5
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 110
364% 131 MB/s
DQ Read 2,404
DQ Write 1,927
DQ Mixed 2,107
1,593% 2,146 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 423%
Great: 435%
MB010000GWRTK 10TB
48GB free
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 120 121 119 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 238
Write 226
Mixed 116
SusWrite 120
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 15.7
4K Mixed 1.8
58% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 4.7
DQ Write 7.5
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 4.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 34%
MB010000GWRTK 10TB
94GB free
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 118 116 118 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 161
Write 157
Mixed 106
SusWrite 117
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 1.5
48% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 3
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 1.5
3% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 34%
Samsung PSSD T7 1TB
17GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 308
Write 317
Mixed 273
67% 299 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 38.4
4K Mixed 22.7
76% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 142
105% 137 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Hitachi HUH721212ALE604 12TB
60GB free
Firmware: HP00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 117 118 119 114 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 78% Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$44
47GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 83 93 90 81 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 25.5
Write 58.7
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 87.9
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK02 10TB
43GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 98 98 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 134
Write 131
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 99
155% 116 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
154% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 89%
External USB3.0 DISK03 10TB
38GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 98 99 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 95.4
SusWrite 99.1
151% 113 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
153% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 92%
External USB3.0 DISK04 4TB
24GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 98 98 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 107
Write 104
Mixed 85
SusWrite 99
134% 98.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C32-16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
199% Outstanding
MC Read 81
MC Write 78.7
MC Mixed 74.5
223% 78.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 51.1
SC Mixed 38.1
111% 39 GB/s
Latency 68.3
58% 68.3 ns
Poor: 128%
This bench: 199%
Great: 207%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 9 60 26.9" 1280 720 AUS27BA ROG XG27UQR
Typical ROG STRIX Z790-H GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,007 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 291%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 346%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-H GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $1,348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback