Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H87 Performance  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '23 at 23:05
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 191
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 286
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250X
Sapphire(174B A002) 2GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 14.5
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 22.5
12% 18.4 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 12.5
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 39 7.6 3.2 37 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 377
Write 162
Mixed 193
SusWrite 56.2
43% 197 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 11.8
53% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 98.4
DQ Write 59.9
DQ Mixed 38.8
40% 65.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 53%
MB010000GWRTK 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: HPG2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 174 170 159 176 184 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 170
Write 161
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 172
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 1.5
49% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 5.4
DQ Write 9.8
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 34%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
7GB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 72 72 72 73 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 76
Write 72
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 72.2
55% 73.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 85%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
64GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 107 106 104 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 102
Write 91.3
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 106
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 1TB
40GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 43 51 47 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 23.4
Write 32.9
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 48.4
44% 30.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
46% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX1600C10D3/8GX KHX1600C10D3/8GX 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 17.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 60 27" 1920 1017 PHLC0FA PHL 276E6
Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $421
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback