ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	ANGXUN
Motherboard	ANGXUN X99-P4
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230801
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 16 '23 at 21:04
Run Duration	289 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 647 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 81.6 2-Core 158 64% 108 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 638 58% 487 Pts	64-Core 1030 64% 1030 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB CLim: 959 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.9.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 28.7 Reflection 45.3 Parallax 46.1 23% 40 fps	MRender 50.6 Gravity 36.7 Splatting 33.6 32% 40.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 188 195 187 203 195 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Read 450 Write 177 Mixed 192 SusWrite 187 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 47 4K Mixed 21.6 83% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 60.8 DQ Mixed 96.4 90% 147 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 76%
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 348GB free Firmware: 0212 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 68 70 87 82 76 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 346 Write 346 Mixed 333 SusWrite 81.4 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 34.6 4K Mixed 20.9 76% 25.2 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 144 101% 126 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 81%
Seagate Basic 5TB 840 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 32GB free Firmware: 9340 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 91 88 77 71 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 49.2 Write 69.3 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 84.6 50% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.5 153% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 65%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 58 59 48 36 31 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 43.5 Write 58.1 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 43.5 36% 49 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.4 153% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 65%
FUJITSU HandyDrive300 250GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 32GB free, PID 113c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 31 32 32 32 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 52.6 Write 24.6 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 31.8 39% 32 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 18%
KIOXIA TransMemory 125GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 47GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 14 7.6 14 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 196 Write 49.2 Mixed 86.9 SusWrite 16 93% 87 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2 147% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF1G72PZ-2G1A2 2x8GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	64.8% Good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 20.7 69% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 16 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 81.4 49% 81.4 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 67%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	58	30	60	27"	1280 720	HSD0000 HQ272PPB

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback