Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 01 '21 at 09:15
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 99%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 103
1-Core 105
2-Core 241
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 476
55% 427 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.9% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 42.5
Parallax 26.1
27% 33.9 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 37
Splatting 0.3
18% 24.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS240G2G0B- 240GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 51 51 68 59 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
78.2% Very good
Read 199
Write 121
Mixed 146
SusWrite 72.2
100% 134 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.3
414% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 78.2%
Great: 166%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 139 146 141 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 97
Write 106
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 138
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
53% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 106%
KIOXIA TransMemory 125GB
100GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.3 12 12 9.6 7.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.83% Terrible
Read 33
Write 7.7
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 8.8
21% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
51.9% Above average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 12.2
328% 12.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback