Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 09:44
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7600K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 271
91% 165 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 476
69% 504 Pts
64-Core 442
27% 442 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.6% Very good
Lighting 93.6
Reflection 100
Parallax 92.3
76% 95.3 fps
MRender 86.4
Gravity 92.4
Splatting 92.2
74% 90.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
669GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 1766 1643 1175 1163 1171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
322% Outstanding
Read 2,329
Write 2,132
Mixed 1,472
SusWrite 1397
411% 1,832 MB/s
4K Read 58.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 85.4
265% 89.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,470
DQ Write 1,235
DQ Mixed 1,337
1,006% 1,348 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 322%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 250GB-$76
170GB free
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 195 184 187 180 190 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 443
Write 313
Mixed 223
SusWrite 196
65% 294 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 20.1
98% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 181
160% 242 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
447GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 439 443 445 441 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 397
Write 398
Mixed 338
SusWrite 440
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 34.1
137% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 167
156% 237 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
154GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 153 154 154 155 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 158
Mixed 103
SusWrite 154
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 141 141 143 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 82
Write 79.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 141
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 84%
KIOXIA TransMemory 125GB
115GB free, PID 6545, KIOXIA
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 34 29 34 26 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 170
Write 12
Mixed 9
SusWrite 30.1
49% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2
178% 5.6 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M4D3600C18 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
91.3% Outstanding
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 30.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 24.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 60
67% 60 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270H GAMING Builds (Compare 3,259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270H GAMING - $247

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $901
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback