Acer Aspire M5802/M3802

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire M5802/M3802  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EG43M
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '23 at 04:40
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 41.3
2-Core 84.1
42% 64.4 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 110
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3E56) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.48
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 8.2
6% 6.83 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 35 31 25 22 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 25.6
Write 48.5
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 29.6
21% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 57%
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
19GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.09% Terrible
Read 30.6
Write 1
Mixed 2
SusWrite 11.8
11% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.09%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JM800QLU-2G 7F7F7F7F7F9B00 7F4F JM800QLU-2G 7F7F7F7F7F9B00 8GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5802/M3802 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5802/M3802

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback