QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 09:37
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 205
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 742
70% 578 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro W5500
AMD(1002 0B0C) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 94.6
54% 75.2 fps
MRender 53.3
Gravity 74.4
Splatting 40
44% 55.9 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 245GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 3,349
Write 2900
Mixed 3,076
693% 3,108 MB/s
4K Read 64.5
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 62.4
210% 62.7 MB/s
DQ Read 807
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 772
583% 780 MB/s
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
2GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 9.5 11 9 9.4 9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 213
Write 18.8
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 10.2
50% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
60% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 37%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 41.3
MC Write 89.8
MC Mixed 56.8
179% 62.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 9.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 99.9
40% 99.9 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 150%
Great: 231%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 40 30 49.5" 1280 720 HEC002F HISENSE
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback