Acer Aspire M5802/M3802

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M5802/M3802  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EG43M
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '20 at 02:38
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 34.5
2-Core 71.9
37% 56.9 Pts
4-Core 69.6
8-Core 69.9
9% 69.8 Pts
64-Core 61.8
4% 61.8 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.6
16% 18.7 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 19.5
Splatting 17.5
14% 17.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
896GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 70 98 98 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 96
Write 95.3
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 87.1
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
896GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 153 163 172 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
98% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 167
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 168
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
259% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JM800QLU-2G 7F7F7F7F7F9B00 7F4F JM800QLU-2G 7F7F7F7F7F9B00 8GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.1
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 21%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5802/M3802 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5802/M3802

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback