MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 198%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory55 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 07 '23 at 15:51
Run Duration882 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$259
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 973
93% 770 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,000
Dell(1028 3880) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 302
Reflection 286
Parallax 336
246% 308 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 252
Splatting 184
204% 260 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 206%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,064
Write 1893
Mixed 1,346
393% 1768 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 59.6
198% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 1,028
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 950
711% 948 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
76GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,137
Write 2,018
Mixed 1,444
415% 1,866 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 60.2
194% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,458
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,174
922% 1,278 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
226GB free
Firmware: 411040RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 266 262 262 259 261 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 429
Mixed 343
SusWrite 272
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 40.3
136% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 254
216% 316 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 115%
SABRENT DISK03 1TB
754GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 366 372 368 374 372 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 276
Write 365
Mixed 257
SusWrite 370
444% 317 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 16.6
1,361% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.3
DQ Write 37.1
DQ Mixed 18.5
1,955% 24.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 191%
Great: 191%
SABRENT DISK02 1TB
900GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 194 193 196 197 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 328
Write 366
Mixed 234
SusWrite 195
374% 281 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 16.5
1,351% 16.8 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 37
DQ Mixed 22.6
2,075% 24.2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 160%
Great: 200%
SABRENT DISK01 1TB
928GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 196 196 198 199 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 332
Write 361
Mixed 262
SusWrite 197
385% 288 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 16.6
1,386% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.2
DQ Write 37.4
DQ Mixed 22.9
2,115% 25.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 164%
Great: 214%
SABRENT DISK00 1TB
743GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 5.4 8 6.1 6.2 6.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 337
Write 347
Mixed 254
SusWrite 6.5
300% 236 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 23.1
4K Mixed 17.3
1,413% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 36.8
DQ Mixed 22.6
2,084% 25.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 124%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 35.6
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 45.7
SC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $835
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback