ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 10FGS1E100

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 10FGS1E100 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 30BC
Memory	8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180904
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 14 '18 at 15:21
Run Duration	317 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6500-$60 241,476 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 100 2-Core 211 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 421 53% 403 Pts	64-Core 422 26% 422 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1642 3F86) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	7.14% Terrible	Lighting 9 Reflection 7.88 Parallax 8.97 7% 8.62 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 7.17 7% 8.46 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.14% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsun 860 EVO 250G 250GB 81 User benchmarks, average bench 109% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 428 266 277 275 277 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 433 Write 405 Mixed 354 SusWrite 324 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 63.3 220% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 294 DQ Mixed 315 238% 319 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 132%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82 64,359 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 119 116 121 120 121 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Read 119 Write 104 Mixed 37 SusWrite 118 69% 94.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 86%
JMicron 320GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 212GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 76 77 75 76 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 86 Write 60.5 Mixed 44 SusWrite 75.5 87% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 31%
SABRENT DISK03 500GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 447GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 18 16 13 20 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 62.3 Write 14.3 Mixed 15 SusWrite 15.6 28% 26.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 185%
SABRENT DISK00 1TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 399GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 2.7 2.6 1.9 3 2.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 74.5 Write 5.5 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 2.4 20% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 209%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GB 6,881 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.2% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 22.3 74% 26 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 21.6 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback