HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '23 at 12:52
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$80
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 100
2-Core 208
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 384
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 18E4) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.4
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 5.8
3% 3.87 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Casper-128GB 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 44 58 52 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 391
Write 99.1
Mixed 181
SusWrite 59.2
40% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 18
39% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 81.2
DQ Write 51
DQ Mixed 11.6
23% 47.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 77%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
381GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 139 139 140 134 139 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 145
Write 146
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 138
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate ST4000VX000-1F4168 4TB
914GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 185 185 189 182 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 130
Mixed 87
SusWrite 186
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
478GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 82 86 85 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 48.8
Write 91.6
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 84.7
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
219% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
851GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 115 116 113 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 93.3
Write 98.4
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 111
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.5
205% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
938GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 110 107 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 48.2
Write 97
Mixed 72
SusWrite 110
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
239% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 14.6
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,719 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback