HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateApr 06 '23 at 09:40
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 180
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 305
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Casper-128GB 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 303 64 63 64 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 467
Write 424
Mixed 387
SusWrite 161
80% 360 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 28.9
123% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 48.9
94% 183 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 77%
IND-S325S/256GB 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0111A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 224 224 214 226 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 81% Great: 119%
WD My Passport 25E1 1TB
782GB free, PID 25e1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 27 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 57.8
Write 22.7
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 27.5
39% 32.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
35% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G9P1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.9
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback