PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 12.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1495 |
Memory | 13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130920 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 20 '23 at 09:51 |
Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 36% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-2500S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
59%
Above average
|
61% 101 Pts
|
31% 234 Pts
|
15% 235 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3799) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
12.1%
Very poor
|
13% 13.3 fps
|
11% 12.7 fps
|
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 66 | 51 | 60 | 21.7" | 1280 720 | GSM5A32 22M35 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 1,685x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 554x |
Core i7-2600Intel $201Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 550x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 1,776x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 279x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 243x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $278 |