Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2800 x 1752 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateMar 30 '23 at 17:29
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 206
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 577
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 708
44% 708 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.7% Good
Lighting 84.9
Reflection 84.9
Parallax 78.9
69% 82.9 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 69.9
68% 85.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 274 267 254 254 267 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 482
Write 457
Mixed 409
SusWrite 284
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 31.6
110% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 366
275% 366 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 85 84 85 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 81.7
Write 92.9
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 84.2
61% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
929GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 113
Write 119
Mixed 63.1
SusWrite 68.6
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 68%
ST6000NM 0044 6TB
5.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 90 94 91 93 91 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.3% Good
Read 200
Write 193
Mixed 114
SusWrite 92.1
194% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.3
202% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
626GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.1 3.5 0.7 0.4 0.3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.2% Very poor
Read 73.1
Write 81.2
Mixed 69.8
SusWrite 2
74% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
272GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.1 3.6 0.6 0.5 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.8% Very poor
Read 81.8
Write 87.1
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 2
78% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 88 92 90 92 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.5% Below average
Read 89.6
Write 97.2
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 90.5
123% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 28.3
MC Mixed 28.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 21.3
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,069 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback