Asrock B450M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 17:57
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 723
68% 567 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Lighting 49.8
Reflection 47
Parallax 42.1
41% 46.3 fps
MRender 39.7
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 37.8
33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGS31-500GS-2 500GB
221GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 90000Q00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 413 278 283 285 284 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 483
Mixed 430
SusWrite 337
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 87.5
4K Mixed 38.4
142% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 368
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 53 72 80 81 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
43.6% Average
Read 79.8
Write 75.3
Mixed 68
SusWrite 71.8
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 63%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
30GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 68 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 68
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 67.6
46% 62.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 68%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 93 80 112 108 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
Read 129
Write 131
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 95.9
148% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
105% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 60 40 0.2 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.9% Poor
Read 117
Write 116
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 28.6
116% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 62 97 111 108 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 82
SusWrite 97.3
144% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 47%
WDC WD30 09FYPX-09AAMB0 3TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.6% Poor
Read 110
Write 105
Mixed 89
SusWrite 5
98% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C12 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 32.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 28.3
85% 29.7 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4 Builds (Compare 9,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $381WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback