Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '17 at 12:16
Run Duration	520 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Memory 96.2 1-Core 125 2-Core 248 88% 156 Pts	4-Core 483 8-Core 630 71% 556 Pts	64-Core 631 39% 631 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8641) 2GB CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	5.6% Terrible	Lighting 6.93 Reflection 7.54 Parallax 8.34 6% 7.61 fps	MRender 4.76 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 7.39 6% 6.58 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.6% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 307GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 901 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 313 (B1) Unknown 99 99 4 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 9 (F1) Unknown 99 99 3871890928	36.3% Below average	Read 379 Write 176 Mixed 226 57% 260 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 1.84 38% 8.89 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 857GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 71 (03) Spinup time 127 127 21494366505 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7480 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 9965 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4531 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7480 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7480 (C2) HDA temperature 230 230 188979544090 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	66.3% Good	Read 114 Write 117 Mixed 98.7 82% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.24 106% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 108%
Asmedia ASMT1153e 500GB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 278GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.3% Very poor	Read 22.8 Write 30.2 Mixed 28.9 21% 27.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.34 77% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.3% Great: 77%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 299GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 171 2183 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6288 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13145 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5982 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 466 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5821 (C2) HDA temperature 116 100 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	76.1% Very good	Read 139 Write 126 Mixed 127 98% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.11 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.29 120% 1.22 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 228GB free Firmware: 3.ADG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 103 86 144873586 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11541 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 841503343 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 33040 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6127 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 47 471466012 (C2) HDA temperature 28 53 60129542172 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 62 55 243794797 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	43.4% Average	Read 75.4 Write 75.7 Mixed 76.1 57% 75.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.19 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60 16,391 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 188GB free Firmware: 3.ADG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 106 91 170445761 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10899 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 889223642 (09) Power-on hours count 62 62 33330 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 6123 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 45 471400476 (C2) HDA temperature 28 55 64424509468 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 60 55 55698181 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 252 1	41.6% Average	Read 75.1 Write 69.8 Mixed 63.3 52% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.43 83% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 41.6% Great: 44%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 578 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2TB free, PID 61b7 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 31.4 96% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.39 4K Mixed 0.09 87% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 56%
ST350083 0A 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 466GB free, PID 007e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 27.7 Mixed 13.3 29% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.37 61% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 17%
Maxtor 3200 251GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 180GB free, PID 3200 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.5% Poor	Read 28.9 Write 26.6 Mixed 26.7 35% 27.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 3.69 4K Mixed 0.36 140% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 21%
Samsung M3 Portable 2TB 5,095 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 157GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 29.5 Write 28.8 Mixed 27.8 37% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.28 62% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 52%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB 1,289 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 142GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 26.2 Mixed 27.5 36% 28 MB/s	4K Read 0.04 4K Write 0.04 4K Mixed 0.05 3% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 22%
WD 10EACS External 1TB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 69GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 19.1 Mixed 14.1 22% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.87 4K Mixed 0.31 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	45.2% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 13.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 15.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 53.2 75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	762x
Core i5-3570KIntel $50Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	514x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	391x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	155x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	147x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	123x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	76x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	71x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	66x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	58x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	55x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $391

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363