Asus P8Z77-V

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.69% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 20 '19 at 15:50
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 96.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 233
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 587
61% 489 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Asus(1043 8641) 2GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
5.69% Terrible
Lighting 7.03
Reflection 7.69
Parallax 8.31
6% 7.68 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 7.77
Splatting 7.52
6% 6.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.69%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 350
Write 344
Mixed 308
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 34.9
123% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 267
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 232
176% 237 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
355GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 150
Mixed 38
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
22GB free
Firmware: 3.ADG
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 42.8
Write 41.5
Mixed 30
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 44%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
186GB free
Firmware: 3.ADG
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 70.2
Write 71.5
Mixed 43
46% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 44%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
540GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 129
Write 100
Mixed 37.8
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
Maxtor 3200 251GB
64GB free, PID 3200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 5,180
Write 19.8
Mixed 39.2
1,168% 1,746 MB/s
4K Read 636
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.5
2,537% 214 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 21%
ST350083 0A 500GB
369GB free, PID 007e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 36.2
Write 18.2
Mixed 28.7
33% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 17%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
250GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 35.5
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 11.5
36% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 22%
WD 10EACS External 1TB
29GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 35
Write 36.2
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 11.7
36% 27.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 04CD F3-12800CL9-4GBSR KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 15
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 53.5
75% 53.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V Builds (Compare 2,154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback