Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA VG10S
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130925
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 08:34
Run Duration450 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 136
66% 105 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 192
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA47) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.07% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 6
Parallax 4.7
0% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.5
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.07%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB
703GB free
Firmware: 1405
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.49% Terrible
Read 37.8
Write 36
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 3.7
6% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.9
13% 4.67 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 1
2% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.49%
Great: 29%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 750GB-$125
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JA2OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 32 59 61 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 70.5
Write 73.4
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 54.6
42% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36%
Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
955GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.5 3.5 3.6 3.6 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.98% Terrible
Read 29.4
Write 29.2
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 3.9
16% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
179% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
955GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 33
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 3.6
17% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 33.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 3.6
19% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 103%
Seagate OneTouch HDD 4TB
457GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 75 77 77 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 57.4
Write 80.3
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 74.8
53% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 71%
WD Elements 2TB
477GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.7 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 27.3
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 3.6
28% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
78% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 2TB
372GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.6 3.5 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 33.7
Write 28.3
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 3.6
29% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 44%
WD 10EAVS External 1TB
181GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 35
Write 31.5
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 3.6
31% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 22%
WD 6400AAK External 640GB
201GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.7 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 3.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 34
Write 29.9
Mixed 28
SusWrite 3.6
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 18.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 63
63% 63 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE P50-A-13F Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE P50-A-13F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $315
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback