HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	8.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 339A
Memory	9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	44%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 149 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 306 34% 269 Pts	64-Core 299 18% 299 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645 4,869 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Nvidia(10DE 1029) 1GB CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	8.68% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 13.3 8% 9.37 fps	MRender 13.2 Gravity 12.9 Splatting 10.7 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.68% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Microfrom 256GB SATA3 SSD 256GB 251 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 142GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0718B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 38 112 114 114 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 421 Write 407 Mixed 386 SusWrite 102 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 23.3 96% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 186 DQ Write 183 DQ Mixed 34.2 67% 134 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 94%
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB 582 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 587GB free Firmware: NS00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 102 105 106 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 103 Write 100 Mixed 65.5 SusWrite 104 69% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 86%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 93 95 92 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Read 85.7 Write 90 Mixed 60.8 SusWrite 93.7 61% 82.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 55%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 123 129 130 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	79.2% Very good	Read 144 Write 130 Mixed 85 SusWrite 131 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 0.8 268% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4.5TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 151 137 140 145 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	83.6% Excellent	Read 146 Write 154 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 144 86% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.9 263% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop 8TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 720GB free Firmware: 040B SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.1 9.2 9.1 9.2 9.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 55.2 Write 24.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 9.2 21% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.9 318% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 93%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB 5,996 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 541GB free Firmware: 1707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.2 9.1 9.1 9.2 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 28.7 Write 29.7 Mixed 27 SusWrite 9.2 18% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 141% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 69%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.7 9.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 54.7 Write 26.2 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 8.8 33% 28.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.8 57% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 22%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.9 8.8 8.8 8.7 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	12.1% Very poor	Read 54.7 Write 25.2 Mixed 25 SusWrite 8.8 33% 28.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 53% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.1% Great: 22%
ST350031 2CS 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 464GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 91 92 93 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 111 Write 102 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 95.1 118% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 42%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 987GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 5.2 1.6 2 1.4 56 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.3% Poor	Read 100 Write 105 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 11.2 71% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 54%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 5 9 3.9 3.4 3.1 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.5% Poor	Read 149 Write 153 Mixed 32 SusWrite 5.2 101% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 54%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 90 91 92 100 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.5% Below average	Read 116 Write 97.5 Mixed 18 SusWrite 94.5 104% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 38% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 54%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 62 60 61 61 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 118 Write 105 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 60.5 115% 88.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.6 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.2 184% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 73%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 60 61 60 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	43% Average	Read 122 Write 119 Mixed 74.5 SusWrite 61.3 122% 94.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 1.2 179% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 4x4GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 14.1 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 87.8 46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	920x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	289x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	207x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	420x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	193x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	130x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	88x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	20x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	20x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353