Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 74% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '22 at 16:44
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	MNE-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 113 2-Core 232 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 422 8-Core 738 70% 580 Pts	64-Core 969 60% 969 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$279 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4072) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.40 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93.8% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 110 Parallax 115 100% 116 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 94.1 Splatting 85.7 82% 103 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 150 134 200 114 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 488 Mixed 381 SusWrite 174 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 95.2 4K Mixed 53.1 182% 63.5 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 231 211% 322 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 118%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 50GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,522 Write 2,335 Mixed 1,699 486% 2,185 MB/s	4K Read 59.7 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 83.3 273% 95.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,180 DQ Write 910 DQ Mixed 1,023 771% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 194GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 47 46 47 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 70.6 Write 67.1 Mixed 61.9 SusWrite 45.8 46% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 57%
StoreJet 2TB 416 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 160GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 85 82 89 88 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 24.4 Write 58.1 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 82.6 35% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.4 90% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 69%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 83GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 30 33 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 38 Write 31.8 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 31.6 42% 32 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB 43,162 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	92.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 37.4 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 36.6 81% 28.3 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 92.6% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,025 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	840x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	628x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	297x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	226x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $480

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16