Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 09:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.1% Average
Memory 58.7
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 164
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 223
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 240
15% 240 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 5.7
5% 5.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M10C 256GB
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1205B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 78 91 109 238 367 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 382
Write 51.2
Mixed 116
SusWrite 167
39% 179 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 21.4
106% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 97
DQ Mixed 29.1
48% 93.9 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 90%
takeMS USB Mini 8GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6.6 6.6 6.9 6.8 6.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 203
Write 6.2
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.5
40% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 60.9
4K Mixed 0
339% 30.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GSA8G4SCL196P-26 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.1% Above average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 10.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback