Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 97.3
2-Core 153
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 306
41% 305 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 5.44
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 5.47
Splatting 0.09
3% 3.95 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M10C 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0724A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 369 381 385 387 387 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 450
Write 385
Mixed 356
SusWrite 378
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 95.6
4K Mixed 26.8
125% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 38.8
79% 154 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GSA8G4SCL196P-26 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (93rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.7% Good
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 45
MC Mixed 12.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 89.2
45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback