Chuwi CoreBook X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemChuwi CoreBook X  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI CoreBook X
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 04:30
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 196
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 291
38% 284 Pts
64-Core 284
18% 284 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7637
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 12.1
Reflection 10
Parallax 13.5
10% 11.9 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 13
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 38 52 43 52 45 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 446
Write 373
Mixed 320
SusWrite 91.2
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 35.6
133% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 313
DQ Mixed 206
181% 269 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.8% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CoreBook X Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi CoreBook X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback