Chuwi CoreBook X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemChuwi CoreBook X  (all builds)
MotherboardCHUWI CoreBook X
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '21 at 16:29
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7267U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 186
72% 125 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 280
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 291
18% 291 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
8.45% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 10
Parallax 13.3
9% 11.6 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 0.2
7% 9.47 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.45%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B 500GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 403 405 408 402 402 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 399
Mixed 333
SusWrite 400
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 41.3
150% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 195
187% 296 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 104%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (96th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 18.5
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 15.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CoreBook X Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi CoreBook X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback