Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 09:48
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 209
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 624
61% 501 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.2% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 41.6
37% 44.7 fps
MRender 37
Gravity 42
Splatting 36.9
32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
778GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1352 1639 1677 1749 1746 1743 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
265% Outstanding
Read 2,044
Write 1,679
Mixed 1,360
SusWrite 1651
378% 1,684 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 40.2
172% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 780
DQ Write 583
DQ Mixed 567
455% 643 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 265%
Great: 352%
SSD 2000GB 2TB
902GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 238 417 437 433 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 257
Write 127
Mixed 171
SusWrite 347
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 15.5
90% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 37.5
84% 167 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 105%
Team T253X2512G 512GB
400GB free
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 376 384 398 392 398 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 477
Write 378
Mixed 361
SusWrite 384
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 25.6
114% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 37.7
80% 158 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 71 74 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 141
Write 144
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 73.5
119% 95 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
46% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 20.3
66% 22.9 GB/s
Latency 92.7
43% 92.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,932 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback