Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive261% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 11:57
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 587
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 598
37% 598 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Nvidia(10DE 1138) 2GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.6% Below average
Lighting 44.6
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 41.1
36% 43.9 fps
MRender 36.7
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 36.5
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S1000G 1TB
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1402 1654 1687 1742 1764 1747 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1918
Write 1,728
Mixed 1,413
SusWrite 1,666
378% 1,681 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 39.4
176% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 574
DQ Mixed 566
453% 640 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 261%
Great: 352%
SSD 2000GB 2TB
912GB free
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 133 381 438 431 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 257
Write 132
Mixed 170
SusWrite 325
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 16.6
93% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 37.1
87% 175 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 105%
Team T253X2512G 512GB
399GB free
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 383 383 393 399 399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Read 484
Write 379
Mixed 372
SusWrite 386
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 25.3
116% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 38.4
83% 165 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 100%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
1TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 90 90 90 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 145
Write 100
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 90.2
109% 89 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2133C13 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 24.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 2,931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $233
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback