Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AE8h
Memory16.8 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 16:24
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5506
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 105
40% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 377
35% 293 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
Sapphire(174B 1255) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 37.9
27% 34.9 fps
MRender 46.2
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 35.3
33% 41 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 109 124 131 144 147 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
63% Good
Read 84.9
Write 94.2
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 132
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.6
267% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:04 43 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 ID:04 43 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 ID:04 43 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 ID:04 43 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 ID:04 43 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 ID:04 43 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 58GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.5% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 11.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback