Today's hottest deals

IBM 49Y6498

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIBM 49Y6498  (all builds)
Memory52.4 GB free of 56 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090820
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 20:58
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5506
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 43.7
2-Core 94.8
36% 61.7 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 414
35% 303 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 130 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 124
Write 120
Mixed 73
SusWrite 128
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
362GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 104 103 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 101
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%
External USB3.0 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 33.6
Write 29.9
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 28.6
23% 30.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 7.5
1,267% 7.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
35GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 54 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 110
Write 73
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 54.1
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 46 46 47 48 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 65.4
Write 70.9
Mixed 39.6
SusWrite 46.9
41% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7x8GB
7 of 16 slots used
56GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
32.4% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.9 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 49Y6498 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

Motherboard: IBM 49Y6498

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback