Today's hottest deals

HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP Z600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory1.1 GB free of 6.00195 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101013
Uptime7.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '17 at 23:19
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5506
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 53.8
2-Core 108
50% 80.1 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 429
38% 323 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.1% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 76.9
Parallax 74.9
43% 68.1 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 68.1
Splatting 73.6
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X411 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.4% Average
Read 257
Write 169
Mixed 174
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 15.7
58% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 44.3
62% 117 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 107%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
14GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
6.19% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 7.14
Mixed 7.61
13% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.35
4K Write 0.004
4K Mixed 0.004
16% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.19%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 9JSF12872AZ-1G4F1 40GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 34816 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.9% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.6
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,233 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP Z600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback