bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 10:26
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 50.1
1-Core 44.6
2-Core 82.9
36% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 271
27% 218 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 275GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 148 138 145 140 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 406
Write 389
Mixed 418
SusWrite 144
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 12.9
43% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 66
DQ Write 39.4
DQ Mixed 50.5
38% 52 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 75%
Virtual HD 69GB
59GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 112 116 118 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 365
Write 415
Mixed 317
SusWrite 115
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 7.5
24% 7.73 MB/s
DQ Read 65.3
DQ Write 63.7
DQ Mixed 62.6
48% 63.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 79%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 128 144 133 135 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 400
Write 398
Mixed 420
SusWrite 136
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 14.5
48% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 65.1
DQ Write 40.9
DQ Mixed 49.5
38% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
1024, 31744 MB
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.2
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback