bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 08:03
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8272CL
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 29.1
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 84.1
28% 51.2 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 304
27% 230 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 275GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 106 97 94 98 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 296
Write 314
Mixed 306
SusWrite 100
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 14.9
4K Mixed 13.9
43% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 62.9
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 36.1
30% 43.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 75%
Virtual HD 69GB
59GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 77 77 68 84 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24% Poor
Read 276
Write 358
Mixed 256
SusWrite 80.4
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 9.7
4K Mixed 6.5
17% 6.17 MB/s
DQ Read 60
DQ Write 55.2
DQ Mixed 58.5
44% 57.9 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 24%
Great: 79%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 2TB
695GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 75 82 82 89 97 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 205
Write 11.5
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 75.7
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Mixed 1.2
1,031% 7.25 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
1024, 31744 MB
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.6
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 3.7
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback