bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '18 at 15:06
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v4
None, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 65.4
1-Core 83.9
2-Core 158
59% 103 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 651
57% 487 Pts
64-Core 1,281
79% 1,281 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 513
Mixed 466
107% 478 MB/s
4K Read 56
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 40.1
161% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 253
DQ Mixed 118
124% 203 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 109%
Great: 78%
Virtual HD 69GB
59GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 512
Write 514
Mixed 514
115% 514 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 16.4
60% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 97.1
99% 157 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
null MHz
512, 32256 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 57.3
MC Write 48.8
MC Mixed 45
144% 50.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.5
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 122%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,525 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback