Today's hottest deals

HP Z200 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.64% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z200 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B40h
Memory4.2 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20101118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3430
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 110
48% 78.4 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 203
26% 196 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 240
Dell(1028 210B) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
4.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 9.7
5% 6.77 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 4.3
4% 5.57 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.64%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2KF180G8L 180GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHFL04P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 187 188 198 195 191 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 192
Write 175
Mixed 182
SusWrite 192
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 19.3
71% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 171
133% 182 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 97%
Seagate 2.0 TB 2TB
883GB free
Firmware: ES22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 145 151 146 152 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 149
Write 150
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 149
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 12
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 8.6
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 Workstation Builds (Compare 248 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback