Today's hottest deals

HP Z200 SFF Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Z200 SFF Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B48h
Memory6.6 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '20 at 09:41
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$200
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 82.6
2-Core 162
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 364
41% 320 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600
HP(103C 0835) 1GB
CLim: 640 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.53
3% 3.91 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 4.13
Splatting 2.83
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.13%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 242 244 235 240 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.8% Above average
Read 231
Write 161
Mixed 195
SusWrite 238
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 24.5
89% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 130
114% 171 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 108%
USB Flash DISK 16GB
4GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.7 8.5 8.2 8.4 8.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.15% Terrible
Read 17.8
Write 5.5
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 8.3
10% 9.02 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.15%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:00 00 ID:00 00 44GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
41.2% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.3
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z200 SFF Workstation Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z200 SFF Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback